Source: Jakub Janda, Head of the Kremlin Watch Program and deputy director at the European Values Think-Tank based in Prague.

All views and opinions expressed here below published by Kremlin Watch (A Strategic program of the European Values Think Tank based in the Czech Republic dealing with Russian influence and disinformation campaigns) are the sole responsibility of the author of the article. It does not necessarily reflect those of AALEP.

Six countries are concerned about Russia’s foreign policy and are now at the forefront of the European response to its aggression

  1. Estonia
  2. Denmark
  3. Latvia
  4. Lithuania
  5. Poland
  6. United Kingdom

Five countries have significantly shifted their policies and concerns after Russia’s aggression against Ukraine

  1. Czech Republic
  2. Finland
  3. Germany
  4. Netherlands
  5. Sweden

Three countries are below the radar supporters of countering Russian aggression

  1. Bulgaria
  2. Croatia
  3. Romania

Three states have virtually no relevant relations with Russia

  1. Ireland
  2. Malta
  3. Portugal

Six countries are trying to avoid the issue

  1. Austria
  2. Belgium
  3. France
  4. Luxemburg
  5. Spain
  6. Slovenia

Two governments are using the Russia card for domestic reasons

  1. Hungary
  2. Slovakia

Three states are still Kremlin-friendly

  1. Cyprus
  2. Greece
  3. Italy

Thirteen EU countries are highly concerned with the Russian disinformation threat and participate in at least one of the three allied projects tasked with countering Russia-linked disinformation operations.

  1. Estonia
  2. Latvia
  3. Lithuania
  4. United Kingdom
  5. Sweden
  6. Finland
  7. Czech Republic
  8. Germany
  9. Poland
  10. Netherlands
  11. France
  12. Italy
  13. Denmark

However, the group of EU countries clearly concerned with Russian aggression is missing a leader. The United Kingdom is on its way out, Germany still does not want to take an openly hawkish stand against Russia, and Poland is missing the chance to be a legitimate leader of this pack because of its government’s unconstructive behavior.

The most reliably Kremlin-friendly position is held by Italy, which has expressed its views by openly vetoing the expansion of sanctions.

The game-changer will be the next German government coalition, which can shift European efforts to counter and mitigate Russian aggression in one of two ways. It can either appease the Kremlin and effectively kill the sanctions, or it can follow up on the principled position held by Chancellor Angela Merkel to devise a government policy that responds to the Kremlin on every level from Ukraine to disinformation threats and become the prime defender of the liberal international order.

Threat Perceptions

EU member states perceive three major categories of aggressive steps taken by the Russian Federation. The first is Russian military aggression the war against Ukraine beginning in 2014. The Russian invasion of Ukrainian territory has by far the most impact on how European security institutions see the security environment.

The second category covers Russian efforts to bully or threaten EU member states using military power. These threats are very visible in the Baltic countries, as well as in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden.

The third category includes Russian efforts and activities to disrupt the European consensus on policy initiatives such as sanctions, and to support pro-Kremlin political leaders through hostile influence and disinformation operations. This threat has a growing importance in countries that do not feel directly militarily threatened, such as Germany.

In most Eastern European and Scandinavian countries, perceptions of threats coming from Russia are generally shared among national security establishments as well as the majority of the political class. In Western and southern European countries, however, there is often a divide between national security professionals and the majority of the political class, which sometimes adopts an appeasement or naïve position toward the Kremlin’s actions. For example, French and Italian militaries are participating in the work of NATO StratCom COE, despite their political leadership being very hesitant on the issue.

When one examines public annual reports of European intelligence and counterintelligence agencies, two trends are apparent. First, many European intelligence agencies tend to be very vocal in their warnings against Russian behavior, mainly against the hostile interference in their domestic affairs (for example, France, Germany, Netherlands, United Kingdom, and Czech Republic). Some European intelligence chiefs have even stepped out publicly to warn of these threats with an on-the-record engagement that is unusual for them.

Second, the Kremlin’s behavior is portrayed as worsening inside Russia, as well as in its Eastern European neighborhood (toward Belarus and Moldova, in addition to Ukraine) and inside EU member states.


  1. The Russian Federation’s aggressiveness is based on internal factors; the kleptocratic regime needs to feed its domestic audience with the continued perception of an external threat. This is not going to disappear overnight, nor from European politicians simply being nice to Putin.
  2. Most of the concerned countries’ diplomatic efforts should focus on quietly helping Germany adopt the position of prime defender of the liberal international order.
  3. It is unreasonable to expect the positions of Greece, Italy, and Cyprus to significantly move.
  4. The European debate should focus on how Russia uses energy to increase individual countries’ dependence on Moscow.
  5. European countries should develop their own national defense mechanisms and policies against hostile foreign influences and disinformation operations.
  6. The thirteen EU states concerned with Russian disinformation should ask EU High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy Federica Mogherini to strengthen and reinforce the EEAS East StratCom Team.
  7. Ideally, the Polish government should act constructively within the EU and become a respected leader that spearheads actions to deter and mitigate the threat.

Add new comment