ASSESSING A COUNTRY’S RISKS AND VULNERABILITIES TO FOREIGN INTERFERENCE
Submitted by christian on Wed, 01/05/2022 - 12:26
Society Permeability
- There is a movement or tendency towards regional secession within current borders.
- Significant ethnic minorities are excluded from political, economic, or social representation.
- Significant religious or confessional minorities are excluded from political, economic, or social representation.
- There is an ongoing conflict between religious believers and secularists regarding how society should work.
- A significant part of the population believes country is losing its sovereignty and independence to make its own political decisions.
- Violent behaviour often occurs towards individuals based on their ethnicity, clan, or religious beliefs.
- Many people believe public institutions or public service providers are not there to help them or do not do enough for them.
- Many people believe election results and proceedings are false or manipulated.
- There are regions of the country or sections of society that are much poorer than others.
- A significant part of the population believes people can succeed only if they have political support or patronage.
- A significant part of the population would prefer a strong and authoritative leader rather than the more deliberative institutions of democracy.
- Social or development aid organisations based in non-Western countries have a strong presence in society.
- There is an intensifying or strong line of thinking that glorifies the country’s identity in historical, pre-modern, and/or non-Western terms.
- There is a strong feeling of nostalgia for how things used to be in the country before democracy/capitalism.
- Many people believe that social or economic modernisation in the country is taking place too quickly.
- The dominant religious institution or institutions is/are strongly opposing some of the modernising changes that are happening in society.
- Many people believe that Western businesses/capital are taking over or crowding out national businesses/capital.
- Many people have a superficial representation of the West because they have limited direct exposure to Western countries, cinema, media, or languages.
- There is a significant part of the mainstream media discourse in the country that is critical of NATO or the EU.
- Many people have negative personal opinions about NATO or the EU.
- Many of the political leaders engaging in pro-Western public discourse are considered corrupt or insincere.
- Some nationalist or anti-Western public figures, artists, or groups are widely popular.
- Fake or misleading political or news stories often garner more visibility than their rebuttals or clarifications.
- A significant part of the media, NGOs, and informal groups in the country are openly arguing against modernisation or liberal democracy.
- Journalists and/or civil society activists are often labelled foreign spies, mercenaries, or servants of foreign powers that aim to destabilise the country.
- Media and civil society fail to properly warn or prepare the wider public to resist media manipulation.
- Nationalist or anti-Western views from new or little-known sources often go viral on social media.
- The activities of the media and civil society rarely focus on foreign policy or defence risks and vulnerabilities in a professional and unbiased manner.
- Some regions of the country or sections of society are significantly more likely to be manipulated by fake or misleading media.
Economic Permeability
- The combined status of the country’s national debt and its budgetary deficit is generating anxiety for investors.
- The country has an unsuccessful working relationship with international financial institutions such as the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.
- The country is generally unable to borrow from the free market (domestic or international) at low or reasonable rates.
- The government’s macro-economic governance or oversight institutions are incompetent, weak, or highly politicised.
- Weak data collection and lack of transparency policies have made cartelisation possible.
- The level of economic competitiveness is low, which makes it easier for a small number of wealthy individuals to control strategic sectors of the economy.
- The country’s State-Owned Enterprise sector is large and rife with corruption and political cronyism.
- Most local magnates have made their fortunes through political favouritism.
- The country’s growth model and political situation are likely to increase economic inequality for some regions or groups.
- The share of undeclared or illegal labour in the country’s total labour force is significant.
- A significant percentage of local businesses belongs to non-Western countries directly or through clear intermediaries.
- Key economic sectors and state infrastructure are owned or controlled by non-Western entities.
- The current flow of investment is limited, and economic growth is slower than expected.
- A significant share of the banking market is owned by non-Western entities.
- A large part of the population working abroad is employed in non-Western countries.
- A sharp decrease in the level of remittances to the home country would create chaos.
- The country relies heavily on imports from a single major supplier.
- Key energy-intensive industries have a significant influence over the country’s political decisions.
- The country’s key infrastructure is technologically dependent on non-Western countries or entities.
- The country’s energy dependency is used by another country to influence internal politics.
- A significant share of the country’s trade (in general or by strategic sector) is with non-Western countries.
- Important trade routes or energy connections go through the territory of non-Western countries.
- A significant part of the country’s tourism comes from or through non-Western countries.
- National media in the country are guided by illegitimate political or economic interests, rather than profit-making.
- A significant share of the national media market is owned or controlled by non-Western entities
Political Permeability
- The legal and institutional layout of the separation of powers is unclear or unpredictable.
- The system of democratic checks and balances is dysfunctional or unpredictable.
- The distribution of constitutional powers overwhelmingly favours the political actors who resort to populism during electoral campaigns.
- The legislation or practice of raising funds for political parties is not overseen by independent institutions in practice.
- The country’s institutions are ineffective in stopping illegitimate influence on elections.
- Political Parties Political parties have a hard time forming sustainable governing coalitions after elections.
- Generally, political parties in opposition are inactive and unable to properly criticise or take action against contentious government decisions.
- Generally, the government’s legislative agenda is unpredictable and can change overnight.
- Political power within parties is generally concentrated in the hands of one person or a certain cohesive group of interests.
- The institutional layout of the country makes creating a new political party extremely difficult.
- Generally, the priorities of political parties are significantly different from the priorities of the general population.
- The priorities of ethnic minorities are not well represented by the country’s elective and administrative institutions.
- There are significant and cohesive social groups, tied by religion, sexual orientation, wealth, or other binding principles, that feel they are being strategically unrepresented by any relevant political actor.
- Independent civil society organisations have a disproportionately limited influence over political parties or government.
- Political elites are easily influenced by the views of official religious institutions.
- The main allegiance of a significant number of people is not towards the country, but towards their clan, informal interest group, or another country
- Some political elites openly believe that liberal democracy is not the best political system.
- Policymaking is more influenced by ideology or political interests than by evidence and science.
- Anti-establishment or anti-system parties or ideas have thrived in recent elections.
- A significant number of the country’s political elites are mimicking democratic behaviour solely to ease its EU/NATO accession.
- Key civil servants in public administration are controlled by political interest groups, although they are nominally independent.
- The public administration is generally inefficient in implementing public policy.
- The justice system in general tends to be significantly influenced by political or business interests.
- Important political elites tend to be above the law and do not necessarily comply with laws or judicial decisions.
- The non-elective institutions that frame the democratic system (Constitutional Court, Electoral Authority) are highly politicised or irrelevant.
- There is significant public discourse accusing institutions (judiciary, police, military) of force, distorting the country’s democratic order.
Add new comment